Unbreakable bond

Marie Anne Pierrette Paulze Lavoisier

(Montbrison, 1758 – Paris, 1836)

Historical context

We are in the midst of the Enlightenment, the age of equality and the supremacy of reason, the century of Enlightenment and progress. But Enlightenment philosophers considered women intrinsically different from men, as they were dependent on their genitals and therefore physically weak, unstable in character, and in need of a man’s protection and guidance. However, in aristocratic and bourgeois families, it was common practice to educate even girls because it was believed that a good wife, in addition to looking after the home and raising children, should be able to entertain guests with cultured, refined, and brilliant conversation.

Biography

Marie Anne Pierrette Paulze was born in 1758 to a wealthy French family and married twenty-eight-year-old Antoine Laurent Lavoisier when she was just over thirteen. Although it was a marriage of convenience, the bond developed into a loving and collaborative relationship. It is unclear what Marie Anne had studied before her marriage, but it is known that she began to develop an interest in chemistry very early on and actively worked in her husband’s laboratory. She received chemistry lessons from some of Lavoisier’s colleagues, and most of the research conducted in the laboratory was a joint effort between her and her husband. With her, Lavoisier continued his studies on combustion, and thanks to her, and her translation of the works of the Englishmen Black, Cavendish, and Priestley, he was able to keep abreast of current chemical studies and carry out a plan of experiments that revolutionized the study of air and gases in general and led to the discovery of oxygen1. Paulze accompanied Lavoisier in his laboratory, keeping rigorous records of the procedures followed during the experiments and drawing diagrams of his experimental designs. The training she had received from the painter Jacques-Louis David enabled her to precisely draw the experimental apparatuses that allowed many of Lavoisier’s contemporaries to understand his methods and results. Furthermore, Paulze edited his reports and contributed to the publication, in 1789, of Lavoisier’s Elementary Treatise of Chemistry, which proved revolutionary for chemistry in the year of the French Revolution, as it introduced the idea of ​​conservation of mass, a list of elements, and a new system for chemical nomenclature. Later, in 1820, she edited and published Lavoisier’s Memoirs. As with the more famous couple Pierre and Marie Curie, the advancement in chemistry cannot be attributed to one or the other, but it is safe to assume that much of the work credited to Lavoisier bears Marie Anne’s contributions. However, compared to the Curies, the time was not ripe for a woman to be recognized for scientific achievements. On the other hand, Paulze was a great admirer of her husband and, even after his tragic death2, she continued to disseminate his works and recover the notes and laboratory instruments that had been confiscated from him. Many of these are still preserved at Cornell University in New York State.

1 The discovery of oxygen can actually be attributed to other scientists as well. Besides Lavoisier, both Joseph Priestley and Carl Wilhelm Scheele could claim priority in the discovery of the gas we know today as oxygen.

2 Despite his staunch adherence to revolutionary ideals, Lavoisier, who combined his work as a scientist with that of director of the Ferma, the Parisian tax collection office, was arrested by the Reign of Terror in 1794, sentenced to the guillotine, and beheaded along with 28 colleagues in front of his wife, Marie Anne. The Ferma was one of the most hated institutions of the ancien régime, linked as it was to episodes of abuse and corruption by some officials who had amassed immense wealth. His undisputed honesty and his reputation as a scientist were of no avail. It is said that the president of the revolutionary tribunal that convicted Lavoisier responded to his defenders: la République n’a pas besoin de savants! (The Republic does not need savants!)